Polling Booth in Thika. Election Day March 4, 2013. Photo Credit: the author. |
The happiness just could not last. For seven days, I have been very
happy, thrilled to participate in a peaceful, transparent election in Kenya with a
clear outcome. Now, the happiness is fading.
What I
saw with my own eyes was an election that was more fair and transparent
than many American elections that I have participated in. Were there
problems? Yes. Did they mar the integrity of the election as a whole?
Not in my view.
Of course, I am only one person. We do
need to wait and see what the Carter Center has to say. I ran into
several Carter Center observers in the course of my travels. Carter Center Congratulates Voters on Peaceful Elections.
I
feel a little bit as though the international media was looking for
problems, and when they could find violence, they had to focus on
allegations of rigging. My friend Mwanicks and I agree on this. Press Statement March 9, 2013 for Immediate Release to the International Media
Al
Jazeera is really focusing on the Odinga perspective. Sigh. As I
mentioned at the beginning of this blog, I am not a big fan of either
Odinga or Kenyatta. I really liked Martha Karua and Peter Kenneth, and
would have been very happy with Mudavadi. Of course, they all did not
make it. So, I am not starting from a position of having believed that
Kenyatta "should" have won. But, as an observer what I saw is that from
the very beginning, Kenyatta had a sizeable lead, 10 percentage points
at its largest. So, the idea that he did not "win" even when all
irregularities are taken into account, is somewhat surprising.
I
do not think it is inflammatory or unfair to characterize Odinga as
"dramatic." He likes a good narrative, and frankly, from my
observations, he likes trouble. I am very glad that he has taken his
case to the Kenyan Supreme Court. Kenya's Odinga: From the Polls to the Court
It sounds like the case will be presented on Tuesday or Wednesday,
which is fast. Again, I am annoyed that the international press is
making it sound like that is slow. I am an attorney, and people need
time to prepare their cases.
I participated in a
symposium on voting, vote counting, at Harvard in 2004. We argued that
at the end of the day, manual results are what matter. I cannot figure
out how to link it, but here is the cite, and you can pull it up easily
from Google. L. Jean Camp, Warigia Bowman & Allan Friedman
Voting, Vote Capture & Vote Counting Symposium,Proceedings of the 6th Annual National Conference on Digital Government Research, 15-18 May 2005 (Atlanta, GA). pp. 198 .
Indeed, Al Jazeera notes
After electronic vote tallying meant to provide provisional results
within 48 hours collapsed the day after polling day, the system was
abandoned, and officials reverted to a manual count - which had always
been the planned method to establish the definitive result.
Odinga
alleges there was massive tampering with the voter register. I find
that a bit hard to believe, as each voter register was locked into the
ballot box at the end of the tally, so I will be interested to see what
evidence CORD provides to prove this.
If
the Supreme Court agrees with CORD's evidence, there may be a runoff,
which will expensive and destabilizing, and may, in my view, heighten
the probability of violence.
What
I feel good about is that my perspective as an official elections
observer matches nicely with that of both ELOG and the European Union.
But such cases [of electoral irregularities] remain isolated examples, said election observers.
European Union observers praised Kenya for "demonstrating a strong
commitment to democratic elections" in an "ambitious undertaking".
I
just hope that the international media and international multilateral
organizations are willing to let Kenya have its success. Let the
country, (and the IEBC) have a day in the sun. Let us all get back to work.
~WMB
No comments:
Post a Comment